Jaimanti Devi And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7336 of 2017 ======================================================
1. Jaimanti Devi, Wife of Saryu Prasad
2. Asha Devi, Wife of Basudeo Prasad Thathera
3. Akhilesh Prasad, Son of Rajendra Prasad
4. Geeta Devi, Wife of Raja Ram Prasad
5. Kapurva Devi, Wife of Late Tapeshwar Sao Thathera All are Resident of Mohalla- Mirzapur, Near K.L.S. High School, Ward No. 20, P.S.- Nawada, District- Nawada. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna, having his office at Old Secretariat, Patna.
2. The Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department, Bihar, Patna Having his office of Old Secretariat, Patna.
3. The Principal Secretary, Urban Development Department Having his office at New Secretariat, Patna.
4. The District Officer-cum- Collector, Nawada.
5. The Sub- Divisional Officer, Nawada.
6. The Deputy Commissioner Land Reforms, Nawada.
7. The Circle Officer, Nawada.
8. The S.H.O. Town P.S. Nawada.
9. The Halka Karamchari, Nawada.
10. The Anchal Amin, Nawada.
11. Sumitra Devi, Wife of Arun Kumar Subodh, Resident of Mohalla- Mirzapur, Linepar, P.S. Nawada, District Nawada.
12. Sanjay Kumar alias Sanju Mahto, Son of Bhagwan Mahto, Resident of Mohalla- Mirzapur, Linepar, P.S. Nawada, District Nawada.
13. Nawada Nagar Palika, Nawada through its Executive Officer, Nawada. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Anjani Kumar-AAG 4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 19-12-2017 In the matter of removal of encroachment from the area in question, records indicate that respondent No.7, the Circle Officer, Nawada has already initiated Encroachment
Patna High Court CWJC No.7336 of 2017(4) dt.19-12-2017 2/2 Proceedings being Encroachment Proceeding No.4/2017-18 and the proceedings are pending for removal of the encroachment. Keeping in view the aforesaid, for the present, without entering into the controversy, respondent No.7 is directed to conclude the encroachment proceedings in accordance to law after hearing all concerned, preferably within a period of six months.
With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of.
(Rajendra Menon, CJ) ( Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Sunil/- U