Gopal Karn @ Gopal Prasad Karn v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2982 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-8 Year-2019 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.

GOPAL KARN @ GOPAL PRASAD KARN Son of Late Punnit Lal Das Resident of Village- Pokhar Bhinda, P.S.- Pupari, District- Sitamarhi. At present Rajendra Nagar Terminal R.B.I. Colony E-Block, 61/A, Patna P.S.- Rajendra Nagar, District- Patna.

2.

Subhash Ranjan @ Sonu Son of Gopal Karn @ Gopal Prasad Karn Resident of Village- Pokhar Bhinda, P.S.- Pupari, District- Sitamarhi. At present Rajendra Nagar Terminal R.B.I. Colony E-Block, 61/A, Patna P.S.- Rajendra Nagar, District- Patna.

3.

Veena Karn @ Veena Devi Wife of Gopal Prasad Karn @ Gopal Karn Resident of Village- Pokhar Bhinda, P.S.- Pupari, District- Sitamarhi. At present Rajendra Nagar Terminal R.B.I. Colony E-Block, 61/A, Patna P.S.- Rajendra Nagar, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Gagan Deo Yadav For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Anbzarul Haque Sahara ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 27-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned counsel for the State.

Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 498A and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code and under 3⁄4 of the DP Act. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. They are father in law, brother in law and mother in law of the victim and live separately as such they have no concern with the affairs of the victim and her husband. The allegation is general and omnibus allegation against them. Nothing incriminating has come against them during investigation.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2982 of 2020(2) dt.27-02-2020 2/2 Learned counsel for the informant opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts of the case, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the Court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani in Madhubani Mahila Police Station Case No. 8/2019 on the following conditions:-

(1) Petitioners shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on their absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashi/- U T