Dilshyam Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3527 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-384 Year-2024 Thana- SUGAULI District- East Champaran ====================================================== Dilshyam Kumar Son of Late Bhulan Sah village- Dharmpur P.S- Sagauli DIst- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pramod Mishra, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Arvind Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA ORAL ORDER 09-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sugauli P.S. Case No. 384 of 2024 dated 24.08.2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 137(2), 87 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. The allegation against the petitioner is that he along with other co-accused persons kidnapped the informant's daughter.

4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. It is submitted that the informant in her statement recorded under Section 183 of B.N.S.S. has stated that she was not kidnapped by anyone but she herself went to her maternal

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3527 of 2025(3) dt.09-05-2025 2/2 uncle's house. It was stated before the Magistrate that the victim married with the petitioner two months ago with consent of her parents and due to misunderstanding the present case has been lodged. It is also stated that the entire prosecution story is false and concocted. It is further submitted that the victim is aged about 17 years 10 months. Lastly, it has been submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 26.10.2024, having no criminal antecedent and charge-sheet has been submitted in the case.

5. Learned A.P.P for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Sugauli P.S. Case No. 384 of 2024.

(Khatim Reza, J) prabhat/- U T