Koshlendra Prasad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7327 of 2017 ====================================================== Koshlendra Prasad S/o Sri Jagdish Prasad, Resident of Village- Kebal Bigha Ghang, P.S. Bakhitiyarpur, District- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar, through Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Director, Secondary Education, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Patna Division, Patna.
4. The District Education Officer, District Nalanda.
5. The District Programme Officer, (Establishment), Nalanda. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ram Sagar Singh For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Kameshwar Kumar-Gp17 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 11-04-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the writ application, the respondents have modified the date of regularization of the petitioner. They issued notification whereby the date of regularization of the petitioner stands approved w.e.f. 1.1.1989 in place of 25.1.2000. The only grievance now remains is consequential benefits on account of regularization of the service of the petitioner with effect from 1.9.1989. He submits that in the matter of grant of consequential benefits the respondents have already taken decision and they have decided to make payment of the entire dues in one go in
Patna High Court CWJC No.7327 of 2017(2) dt.11-04-2018 2/2 view of the fact that the petitioner has superannuated. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with observation that the respondents may take final steps for payment of consequential benefit, treating the date of regularization of the services of the petitioner with effect from 1.1.1989 and the monetary benefit of such regularization may be granted to the petitioner within a maximum period of three months from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order. The respondents are also required to work out the claim of the petitioner for grant of pensionary benefit as well within a further period of two month from the date of such decision.
With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Ravi/- U