Shiv Shakti @ Shivam Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3437 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-142 Year-2019 Thana- MAHESHKHUNT District- Khagaria ====================================================== SHIV SHAKTI @ SHIVAM SINGH Son of Late Sunil Singh Resident of Village - Patla, Police Station - Mahesh-Khunt, District - Khagaria. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Viveka Nandsingh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 29-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Maheshkhut P.S. Case No. 142 of 2019 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 379, 447, 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case merely on the basis of suspicion and there is no specific allegation against the petitioner. It is further submitted that the dispute between the parties has already been compromised (Annexure-3). Petitioner is having no criminal antecedent.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as nature of accusation, in the event of his arrest or

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3437 of 2020(2) dt.29-02-2020 2/2 surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarge on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Khagaria in connection with Maheshkhut P.S. Case No. 142 of 2019 on the following conditions:

"(1) Petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present, as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail."

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) mdrashid/- U T