Suryanandan Bind @ Faggu Bind v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15062 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-412 Year-2020 Thana- CHANDI District- Nalanda ====================================================== 1.

SURYANANDAN BIND @ FAGGU BIND Son of Chhatri Bind, Resident of Ganga Bigha, P.S.- Chandi, District- Nalanda. 2.

SHIV BALAK BIND Son of Karu Bind Resident of Ganga Bigha, P.S.- Chandi, District- Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vivek Anand Amritesh, Adv.

For the State :

Mr. Anil Kr. Singh, APP For the Informant : Mr. Mritunjay Kr. Nirala, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 14-07-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State through virtual court proceedings.

Learned counsel for the petitioners undertake to remove the defects as pointed out by the office within four weeks of normal functioning of the court, failing which the office is directed to place the matter before the Bench. The petitioners seek bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 325, 307, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation as per FIR against the petitioner alongwith other accused persons is that they hit the informant's son namely Randhir Kumar on his for-head with an iron rod and lathi. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15062 of 2021(2) dt.14-07-2021 2/2 petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that there is case and counter case between the parties. There is land dispute between the parties. He further submits that the petitioners assaulted the informant's son on his for-head and the injury report is simple in nature. The petitioners are languishing in judicial custody since 01.10.2020. The petitioners have got no criminal antecedent which is mentioned in para 3 of the bail petition.

Learned counsel for the informant submits that the Xray report is awaited of the injured son of the informant. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioners.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Chandi P.S. Case No. 412/2020 to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending/ successor court.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) amitkumar/- U T