Patna High CourtCR. MISC./3042/2020bail granted

Ravi Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2020-01-18Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3042 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-130 Year-2019 Thana- RAUTARA District- Katihar ====================================================== RAVI YADAV Son of Late Laljee Yadav @ Lalji Prasad Yadav Resident of Village - Rautara, Naya Tola, P.S.- Rautara, District- Katihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Uma Shankar Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 18-01-2020 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 414 and 413 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is recovery of two stolen motorcycle from his house premises.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case only on the basis of suspicion. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 26.11.2019.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3042 of 2020(2) dt.18-01-2020 2/2 case is pending in connection with Rautara P.S. Case No. 130 of 2019, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T