Dhurkhali @ Jay Kumar @ Jay Kumar Kamat @ Dhurkholi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5269 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-484 Year-2024 Thana- SINGHESHWAR District- Madhepura ====================================================== Dhurkhali @ Jay Kumar @ Jay Kumar Kamat @ Dhurkholi S/O Buchho Kamat @ Chandra Bhushan Kamet @ Chandra Bhushan Mandal R/O VillageLalpur, Ward No.-09, P.S- Singheshwar, Distt.- Madhepura. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Prem Kumar Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 15-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The present petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioner, apprehending his arrest, in connection with Singheshwar PS. Case No.484 of 2024 dated 15.12.2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. As per allegation, there is recovery of illicit liquor of 39.525 liters from an open space.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submit that the Petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the recovery has not been made from the conscious possession of the petitioner rather the same

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5269 of 2025(2) dt.15-02-2025 2/3 has been recovered from an open space.

5. It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the bail petition that the petitioner has not moved this Court earlier either for anticipatory bail or regular one in the instant case.

6. It has further been stated in paragraph no.3 of the petition that the petitioner has been made accused in one other case in which he is on bail.

7. However, learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the prayer of the Petitioner for bail.

8. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this petition is allowed, directing the petitioner, above-named, to be enlarged on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this order, on his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000 /- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District and Sessions JudgeV,-cum-Special Judge Excise-I, Madhepura, in connection with Singheshwar PS. Case No.484 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.PC and on the following conditions:

(i) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5269 of 2025(2) dt.15-02-2025 3/3 below that the petitioner has criminal antecedents other than the disclosed one, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner after hearing him and getting satisfied that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents despite his knowledge of the same.

(ii) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that statement regarding previous bail petition is wrong, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. (Jitendra Kumar, J) S.Ali/- U