← Library
Patna High Court/4981/2026allowed

Pappu Sah v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-04Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4981 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-110 Year-2025 Thana- KUCHAIKOTE District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Pappu Sah, Son of Hari Kisun Sah, Resident of Village - Kuti, Bathana, P.O.- Shukul Nashwa, P.S.- Kuchaikot, District - Gopalganj, Pin - 841428, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajni Kant, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dilip Kumar No. 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 04-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Kuchaikot P.S. Case No. 110 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 108 and 3(5) B.N.S.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the petitioner along with others has killed the daughter of the informant.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Petitioner is husband of the deceased and he has been falsely implicated in this case. From perusal of the F.I.R. itself it is clear that nature of allegation is general and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4981 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 2/2 omnibus. It has further been submitted that the doctor conducting autopsy of the deceased has only found ligature mark on the person of the deceased and the cause of death is asphyxia due to hanging. Petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 18.03.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional District Judge-II, Gopalganj in connection with Kuchaikot P.S. Case No. 110 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T