← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/1679/2022withdrawn

Rajshekhar Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

2026-01-05Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1679 of 2022 ====================================================== Rajshekhar Chaudhary Son of Baidyanath Chaudhary R/v- Babhangama, Police Station- Triveniganj, District- Supaul. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Director, Mass Education-cum-Joint Secretary, Bihar, Patna. 4.

The District Magistrate, Supaul.

5.

The District Education Officer, Supaul.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Prafull Chandra Thakur, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Smt. Shilpa Singh (GA-12) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 05-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present writ petition has been filed seeking direction against the State Government to absorb the Ex-instructors of Adult and Non-Formal and Mass Education. Counsel submits that this matter has already been decided upto the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India and the petitioner has not moved before this Court on or before 26.02.2016 which was a condition precedent fixed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India for consideration of absorption. He further submits that some matter

Patna High Court CWJC No.1679 of 2022(3) dt.05-01-2026 2/2 is still pending before the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India and as such, he seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty that in case the matter decides in favour of those persons similarly situated as like that of petitioner before Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, then he may sue.

3. Permission is granted.

4. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. (Dr. Anshuman, J) Divyansh/- U