Rupesh Kumar Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.4624 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-58 Year-2018 Thana- NARPATGANJ District- Araria ====================================================== Rupesh Kumar Paswan (M), aged about 20 years, Kapildev Paswan, Resident of Village - Madhura Uttar Ward no. 01, P.S. - Fulkaha, Distt- Araria. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mukesh Kumar Rana, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 31-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Narpatganj P.S. Case No. 58 of 2018 (G.R. 309 of 2018) registered for the offences punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

Informant has alleged that while he was going on his motorcycle he was intercepted by three miscreants riding on a Apachi motorcycle on strength of pistol snatched away his motorcycle, mobile, purse and passbook.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that his name has transpired in this case on the basis of his selfstatement and has been remanded in this case on 19.07.2018. It has been further submitted that nothing has been recovered from

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4624 of 2019(2) dt.31-01-2019 2/2 his possession and petitioner has not been put on T.I.P. Charge sheet has already been submitted in this case. Considering the aforesaid fact and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria, in connection with Narpatganj P.S. Case No. 58 of 2018 ( G.R. No. 309 of 2018), subject to conditions:

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (S. Kumar, J) Rajiv/- U T