Smt. Amerika Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7182 of 2017 ====================================================== Smt. Amerika Devi W/o Sri Chandra Shekhar Yadav, Resident of VillageSahiyar Burj, P.O. AnchalP.S.-Rosera, District- Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The Collector, Samastipur.

3.

The Additional Collector , Samastipur, 4.

The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Rosera, Samastipur. 5.

The Circle Officer, Rosera, Samastipur.

6.

Meghu Das , Son of Late Laxman Das .

7.

Bindo Das, Son of Late Laxman Das, 8.

Kiro Das , Son of Late Laxman Das, 9.

Chhabbu Das, Son of Late Bhola Das, 10.

Jahar Das, Son of Late Bhola Das, 11.

Muso Das , Son of Late Bhola Das, No.6to11, Resident of Village- Sahiyar Burj, P.O.P.S.-Rosera, District- Samastipur.

12.

Mahanth Deep Narayan Das , Chela of Mahanth Thakur Das, Resident of Kabir Math, Laxmi Bagicha, P.O.P.S.- Rosera, District- Samastipur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kaushal Kishore, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Sajid Salim Khan- SC-25 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 19-01-2026 Heard the parties.

2. The present petition has been preferred for the grant of following relief(s):

"for setting aside the order dated 03.01 2017 passed by the Learned Bihar Land Tribunal Court Patna in B.L.T. Case No. 1366/2015 and B.L.T. Case No. 1367 of 2015

Patna High Court CWJC No.7182 of 2017(6) dt.19-01-2026 2/2 and setting aside the order dated 09.06.2015 passed by the Learned Additional Collector, Samastipur in Jamabandi Cancellation Case No. 72 of 2013-14 which was heard alongwith Rent Fixation Appeal No. 76/2013-14 which was allowed by his Common order. or pass such other direction/s order/s writ/s for the petitioner is found to entitled in the facts and circumstances of the case."

3. In this case on 01.09.2025, direction was given to file substitution petition in four weeks.

4. As it was a peremptory order and not complied, it stood dismissed on 07.10.2025.

5. Perused the file, consigned.

(Rajiv Roy, J) vinayak/- U