Meghu Kewat v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15265 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-470 Year-2020 Thana- FATUA District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

MEGHU KEWAT S/o Late Shree Kewat Resident of Abdal Chak, P.S.- Fatuha, Dist- Patna.

2.

Jitendra Kewat Son of Meghu Kewat Resident of Abdal Chak, P.S.- Fatuha, Dist- Patna.

3.

Sharvan Kewat Son of Meghu Kewat Resident of Abdal Chak, P.S.- Fatuha, Dist- Patna.

4.

Nageshwar Kewat Son of Meghu Kewat Resident of Abdal Chak, P.S.- Fatuha, Dist- Patna.

5.

Umesh Kewat Son of Meghu Kewat Resident of Abdal Chak, P.S.- Fatuha, Dist- Patna.

6.

Sanjit Kewat S/o Sunil Kewat Resident of Abdal Chak, P.S.- Fatuha, DistPatna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajesh Mohan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Amit Kumar Rakesh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 25-01-2022 At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner nos. 1, 3, 5 and 6 have been arrested during pendency of this application, and as such, he seeks permission to withdraw this application as against petitioner nos. 1, 3, 5 and 6.

Permission is granted.

The application, thus, stands dismissed as withdrawn as against petitioner nos. 1, 3, 5 and 6. Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15265 of 2021(2) dt.25-01-2022 2/2 State.

Petitioners apprehend arrest in connection with Fatuha P.S. Case No. 470 of 2020 registered for the offence punishable under section 307 and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case due to previous enmity and village politics. No specific overt act is alleged against petitioner nos. 2 and 4. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties, let the petitioner nos. 2 and 4, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing personal bond to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna City, in connection with Fatuha P.S. Case No. 470 of 2020 subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Arvind Srivastava, J) mcv/- U T