Ravindra Kumar @ Pappu Yadav @ Pappu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6879 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-259 Year-2024 Thana- AGAMKUAN District- Patna ====================================================== Ravindra Kumar @ Pappu Yadav @ Pappu S/O Late Nagina Yadav R/O Mohalla- Kumhrar, Nagina Nagar, P.S.- Agamkuan, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Raj Krishna Jha, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Chandra Sen Prasad Singh, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Rajesh Ranjan Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 12-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for informant.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the dispute between the parties has been settled amicably through the process of mediation and for this, the petitioner offered to pay Rs.47,25,000/- (Rupees forty seven lacs twenty five thousand), as full and final settlement amount and informant has accepted the offer and gave her consent.

4. Learned counsel for the informant does not dispute the contention made on behalf of petitioner and confirms the fact regarding settlement entered into between the parties.

5. Here, it is relevant to mention that earlier, with

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6879 of 2025(3) dt.12-05-2025 2/2 consent of the parties, the matter was referred to Mediation & Conciliation Centre of Patna High Court to explore the possibility of settlement between the parties, which has been resolved in terms of Memorandum of Agreement annexed with Mediator's report.

6. Considering the fact that dispute between the parties has been resolved, the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner is allowed.

7. Let the petitioner, as named above, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. - IV, Patna City, Patna in connection with Agamkuan P.S. Case No. 259 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with further condition that petitioner shall abide by all the terms & conditions, mentioned in Memorandum of Agreement, failing which, learned Court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail-bond of the petitioner.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay U T