Lallan Mehta v. The State Of Bihar Through The Home Secretary, Department Of Home Govt. Of Bihar, Patna And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.727 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-1111 Thana- District- ====================================================== Lallan Mehta S/o Sri Deep Narayan Mehta, resident of Village- Kushwaha Nagar, Dhundhuwa, P.O.- Khadha, P.S.- NTPC Khaira, District- Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar Through The Home Secretary, Department Of Home Govt. Of Bihar, Patna 2.

The Director General of Police, Patna, Bihar. 3.

The Deputy Inspector General, Magadh Division, Gaya. 4.

The Superintendent of Police, Aurangabad.

5.

The S.H.O. Police Station, N.T.P.C. Khaira, Aurangabad. 6.

The Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Shiv Kumar Bhartiya Rai Bijlee company Limited ts head office at Dalmia Nagar, Rohtas at Soda Ram. 7.

The Assistant General Manager, Mr. K.K. Roy, Bhartiya Rail Bijlee Company Limited its Head Office at Dalmia Nagar, Rohtas at Soda Ram, Rohtas.

8.

The Engineer R and R, Mr. Puranchan, Bhartiya Rail Bijlee Company Limited its Head Office at Dalmia Nagar, Rohtas at Soda Ram, Rohtas. ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anirudh Kumar Verma, Advocate For the NTPC :

Mr.Tuhin Shankar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 12-12-2022 This writ application has been filed on or about 12.05.2017 seeking direction to the competent authority to get a case registered under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. On perusal of the writ application, this Court finds that prior to filing of this writ application the petitioner has not filed any complaint with the Police Station or with the competent authority in terms of Section 154(3) Cr.P.C. No complaint whatsoever was filed in the

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.727 of 2017(3) dt.12-12-2022 2/2 learned court below.

In the case of Sakiri Vasu v. State of U.P. & Ors. reported in AIR 2008 SC 907, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has taken a view that an application for registration of F.I.R. directly filed before this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is required to be discouraged.

Even otherwise no one is appearing on behalf of the petitioner.

Mr. Tuhin Shankar, learned counsel for the N.T.P.C., Aurangabad is present.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) vats/- U T