Patna High CourtCR. MISC./2964/2019disposed

Hira Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2019-02-28Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2964 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-143 Year-2018 Thana- TARAIYA District- Saran ====================================================== Hira Ram Bharat Ram Resident of Village- Patti Pacharaur, Police StationTaraiya, District- Saran at Chapra. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Satya Prakash For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nityanand ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 28-02-2019 Petitioner, who is in custody (In Cr. Misc. No. 2964 of 2019), seeks bail in connection with Taraiya P.S. Case No. 143 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25(1-b)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act.

Allegation is recovery of one country made pistol and seven live cartridges from the possession of petitioner. Petitioner is also accused in several cases.

Considering the nature of allegation against petitioner, (in Cr. Mis. Case No. 2964 of 2014) I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage.

However, after one year of custody petitioner would be enlarged on bail by the court below itself on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2964 of 2019(5) dt.28-02-2019 2/2 Judicial Magistrate IX, Saran at Chapra, in connection with Taraiya P.S. Case No. 143 of 2018 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T