← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./15192/2021dismissed

Dinesh Rai @ Dinesh Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2021-11-01Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15192 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-149 Year-2020 Thana- JADIA District- Supaul ====================================================== Dinesh Rai @ Dinesh Rai, Son of Late Rameshwar Rai, Resident of Ward No.2, P.O. Jaidiya, P.S. Jaidiya, District Supaul. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. N. K. Agrawal, Senior Advocate Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Rajendra Prasad Nat, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Prafull Chandra Thakur, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 01-11-2021 Heard Mr. N.K. Agrawal, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Mishra, Advocate for the petitioner, Mr. Rajendra Prasad Nat, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State as well as Mr. Prafull Chandra Thakur, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant. The petitioner seeks bail in Jaidiya P.S. Case No.149 of 2020, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Mr. N.K. Agrawal, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The petitioner is said to have assaulted the father of the informant with khanti. The petitioner is in custody since 15.08.2020. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15192 of 2021(4) dt.01-11-2021 2/2 as stated in paragraph 3 of the bail petition. Learned counsel for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submitted that there is specific allegation of assault against the petitioner, which is supported by post mortem report.

Having considered the facts aforesaid, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected.

However, the learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial of the petitioner.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J.) Sanjay/- U T