← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./5133/2022bail rejected

Prabhas Chandra Yadav @ Prabhas Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2022-03-23Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5133 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-466 Year-2018 Thana- BAHADURPUR District- Darbhanga ====================================================== PRABHAS CHANDRA YADAV @ PRABHAS YADAV Son of Gartu Yadav Resident of Village - Taralahi, P.s.- Bahadurpur, Distt.- Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajit Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Sumiran Rai For the informant :

Mr. Saket Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 23-03-2022 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sessions Trial No. 54 of 2019 arising out of Bahadurpur P.S. Case No. 466 of 2018 instituted for the offences under Sections 149, 342, 323, 504, 307, 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The prayer for bail of the petitioner was earlier twice rejected vide orders dated 16.11.2019 and 08.01.2021 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 50380 of 2019 and 23558 of 2020 respectively.

This Court had called for a report about the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5133 of 2022(3) dt.23-03-2022 2/2 stage of the case from the court below vide order dated 09.02.222. The report which has since been received indicates that all the witnesses have been examined except the I.O. of this case, who is likely to be examined in a short while.

With the current stage of trial proceedings, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner during the pendency of the Trial.

However, the Trial Court is directed to conclude the trial within a period of three months from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this order, failing which the petitioner shall have the liberty to approach the Trial Court for grant of bail and in that event the Trial Court would be under an obligation to record the reasons for the tardy progress of trial.

The petition stands disposed of accordingly (Ashutosh Kumar, J) sunilkumar/- U T