Dharmendra Kumar Singh @ Dharmendra Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.14303 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -4 Year- 2016 Thana -RAUTARA District- KATIHAR ======================================================
1. Dharmendra Kumar Singh @ Dharmendra Singh Son of Mithilesh Kumar Singh resident of Village- Rajwara, Police station Rautara, District katihar. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajendra Prasad Sah For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Arbind Kr.Pandey(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 22-06-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Rautara P.S. Case No. 04 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 365, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
Ranjana Devi, the wife of the informant and Lal Babu Kumar, the son of the informant aged 45 years and 10 years respectively became traceless and the informant suspected the hand of the petitioner and when the informant asked to the petitioner about their whereabout, then the petitioner assaulted and abused the informant.
Submission is of false implication and that besides suspicion there is nothing against the petitioner, petitioner is
grand-son of the informant and he and his family members are living separately for last 16 years, having no concern with the informant and the victims, the informant has not given the date as to from when his wife and son became traceless and during investigation, only it has come that the petitioner was seen with the victims, chargesheet has already been submitted and by detaining the petitioner in custody, no fruitful purpose is going to be served and, as such, now he deserves sympathetic consideration.
The learned APP submits that two victims are still traceless.
In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering that chargesheet has already been submitted and there is no chance of tampering with the prosecution evidence and, as such, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri. M.K. Jha, learned J.M. 1st Class, Katihar in connection with Rautara P.S. Case No. 04/2016 subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and
every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.
(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) sushma/- U T