← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./3744/2026bail granted

Bipin Kumar Yadav @ Bipin Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2026-01-28Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3744 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-180 Year-2025 Thana- Rasalpur District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== 1.

Bipin Kumar Yadav @ Bipin Yadav Son of Late Sunil yadav Resident of Rampur Kharhara, Ps- Rasalpur, District- Bhagalpur 2.

Amin Yadav Son of Late Sunil Yadav Resident of Rampur Kharhara, PsRasalpur, District- Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ranjan Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bishweshwar Ram, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 28-01-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioners have preferred this application for grant of anticipatory bail apprehending their arrest in connection with Rasalpur P.S. Case no.180 of 2025 registered under sections 115(2), 126(2), 109, 303(2), 35(2), 352 and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. As per the prosecution case, the eight named accused persons including the two petitioners herein are said to have come variously armed and of having assaulted the informant and the members of her family. It is further stated that on the intervention of the villagers, the informant and others were saved.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case. There is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3744 of 2026(2) dt.28-01-2026 2/2 case and counter case between the parties, the correct version having been given in the counter case, F.I.R of which is Annexure-2 to the petition. The injuries have been found to be simple in nature. The petitioners have no criminal antecedent and undertake to cooperate in the investigation/trial.

5. The application for anticipatory bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegation against the petitioners in the F.I.R., there being case and counter case between the parties, the injuries having been found to be simple in nature and the petitioners not having any criminal antecedent, it is directed that both the petitioners above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with Rasalpur P.S. Case no. 180 of 2025 on each of them furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bhagalpur.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Shiv/- U T