Patna High CourtCWJC/7397/2017disposed

Manoj Kumar @ Manoj Kumar Akela v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-07-18The Chief Justice,Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7397 of 2017 ===========================================================

1. Manoj Kumar @ Manoj Kumar Akela Son of Uma Shankar Yadav Resident of Village- Dahipura, P.S. Keoti, P.O. Samaila Lal Ganj District- Darbhanga. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Deputy Secretary Primary Education Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Chairman Bihar School Examination Board, Patna.

5. The Secretary Bihar School Examination Board, Patna.

6. Union of India through the Director National Counsel of Teacher Education East Zone Bhuvneshwar Odisa.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vasudeo Ram, Advocate For the B.S.E.B. : Mr. Lalit Kishore, Sr. Advocate Mr. Gyan Shankar, Advocate For U.O.I. Mr. S.D. Sanjay, Addl. S.G. Mr. Ravinder Kr. Sharma, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 18-07-2017 Challenging the criteria laid down in the Bihar Teachers Eligibility Test, this petition has been filed in public interest.

In a Public Interest Litigation, we are not inclined to go into the criteria fixed for conducting the eligibility test which is in the process of being conducted. At this stage, based on an allegation made in the Public Interest Litigation, we are not inclined

Patna High Court CWJC No.7397 of 2017 dt.18-07-2017 2/2 to look into the merits of the matter with regard to fixing of criteria. In case the petitioner is aggrieved with the manner in which the criteria have been fixed, he may challenge the same in accordance with law in an appropriate proceeding. The application is dismissed.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) K.C.jha/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 21.7.2017 Transmission Date N/A