← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/7402/2017disposed

Lal Deo Narain Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-04-11Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7402 of 2017 ====================================================== Lal Deo Narain Singh Son of Late Rajendra Prasad Singh Resident of Village Kalyan Bigha, P.S. Harnaut, District - Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Director, Secondary Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Regional Deputy Director, Education of Patna Division, Patna.

4. The District Education Officer, Nalanda at Biharsarif.

5. The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Nalanda at Biharsharif. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ram Sagar Singh For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Madanjeet Kumar- Gp20 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 11-04-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the writ application, the respondents have modified the date of regularization of the petitioner. They issued notification whereby the date of regularization of the petitioner stands approved w.e.f. 1.1.1989 in place of 25.1.2000. The only grievance now remains is consequential benefits on account of regularization of the service of the petitioner with effect from 1.9.1989. He submits that in the matter of grant of consequential benefits the respondents have already taken decision and they have decided to make payment of the entire dues in one go in

Patna High Court CWJC No.7402 of 2017(2) dt.11-04-2018 2/2 view of the fact that the petitioner has superannuated. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with observation that respondents may take final steps for payment of consequential benefit, treating the date of regularization of the services of the petitioner with effect from 1.1.1989 and the monetary benefit of such regularization may be granted to the petitioner within a maximum period of three months from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order. The respondents are also required to work out the claim of the petitioner for grant of pensionary benefit as well within a further period of two month from the date of such decision.

With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Ravi/- U