Rohit Kumar @ Rohit Kumar Thakur @ Anki v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6726 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-70 Year-2024 Thana- GANGABRIDGE District- Vaishali ====================================================== Rohit Kumar @ Rohit Kumar Thakur @ Anki S/o- Dinanath Thakur MohallaNakhas Chok Underkila PS- Hajipur Town District- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bela Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Kumar Veerendra Narayan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 15-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Gangabridge P.S. Case No. 70 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Prosecution case, in short, is that three unknown miscreants, on the point of pistol, looted motorcycle, mobile phone, cash amounting to Rs. 13500/-, locket, Aadhaar Card, driving license of the informant and fled away.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner transpired in this case during investigation on the basis of his

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6726 of 2025(2) dt.15-02-2025 2/2 self-confessional statement. No incriminating/looted article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted that petitioner has got no concern with the looted articles. The recovered motorcycle does not belong to the petitioner. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 18.06.2024 and has three criminal antecedents.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail, after framing of charge, if not already framed, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Gangabridge P.S. Case No. 70 of 2024. (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T