Dinesh Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4831 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-306 Year-2021 Thana- PAROO District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== DINESH RAI SON OF DURGA RAI R/O VILLAGE- LALU CHAPRA, P.S.- PAROO, DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Nitu Kumari For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rajesh Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 22-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Paroo P.S. Case no. 306 of 2021 instituted for the offence under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition of Excise Act. Prosecution case relates to recovery of 1855 litres IMFL from the hut of the petitioner.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He has got no criminal antecedent. Neither the petitioner was arrested on spot nor any incriminating article has been recovered from his conscious and constructive possession.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4831 of 2022(2) dt.22-07-2022 2/2 Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration that the alleged hut belongs to the petitioner, from where recovery of illegal liquor has been made, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner and, as such, his application for bail is rejected.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U