Dilip Manjhi v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.23954 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -537 Year- 2013 Thana -BARACHATTI District- GAYA ======================================================
1. Dilip Manjhi S/o Nanku Kumar Manjhi Resident of Village Pathara, Police Station Mohanpur, District Gaya.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Raj Kumar Manjhi S/o Late Mathura Manjhi Resident of Village Dema Tola, Pathara, Police Station Mohanpur, District Gaya. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhay Kumar Thakur For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ambika Bhagat(Spl. P.P.) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 06-07-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner is in custody in a case registered under Sections 364/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(2) (V) of SC/ST (POA) Act.
The prosecution case in, brief, is that the informant, Raj Kumar Manjhi, has alleged that his younger daughter Bholi Devi had been married about one year back and her second marriage (Gauna) was to be done and on 11.11.2013 at about midnight, she came out from house for taking water and she did not return and when the informant searched her in the village, he learnt that Sudama Yadav,Sadhu Yadav, Pramod @ Karu Yadav and Gayani Yadav have abducted her with intention to kill
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23954 of 2015 (2) dt.06-07-2015 2/2 her.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 15.03.2015. Further it is submitted that the present case has been isntituted after ten days of the occurrence and for the same no explanation has been made on behalf of the prosecution. It is also submitted that there is land dispute between the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the petitioner may be released after completion of six months in custody.
On behalf of the State, it has been submitted that the name of the petitioner has come in course of investigation. Considering the facts aforesaid, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail, after completion of six months in custody from 15/03/2015, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Narendra Pal, learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Sherghati, District-Gaya, in Barachatty (Mohanpur) P.S.Case No.537 of 2013.
(Sudhir Singh, J) singh/- U T