Md. Perwez Alam @ Chunnu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.15568 of 2016 ===================================================== Md. Perwez Alam @ Chunnu, Son of Md. Ainul Haque. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raj Kumar Choudhary For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. H.A.Khan(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 20-04-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under various sections of the Arms Act. Two automatic pistols, two country made pistols and twenty cartridges are said to have been recovered from conscious possession of the petitioner and prior to institution of the present case, petitioner had been made accused in Muffasil P.S. Case No. 138 of 1997 which had been registered under the Arms Act but he got acquittal in the aforesaid case.

However, taking note of recovery made from conscious possession of the petitioner, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail, at least, at this stage and hence, his prayer for bail in connection with Jamalpur Rail P.S. Case No. 23 of 2015

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.15568 of 2016 (2) dt.20-04-2016 2/2 pending in the court of Railway Judicial Magistrate, Kiul stands rejected.

However, learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial of the petitioner and try to conclude the same as early as possible, preferably within six months from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, failing which the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail before the learned trial court itself.

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) SHAHZAD/- U T