← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./15634/2021bail granted

Pappu Singh @ Pappu Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2021-11-23Mr. Justice Birendra Kumar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15634 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-241 Year-2020 Thana- SHIVSAGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.

Pappu Singh @ Pappu Kumar Singh Son Of Late Baleshwar Singh Resident Of Village- Sonhar, P.S.- Sheosagar, District- Rohtas At Sasaram. 2.

Law Singh Son of Lalan Singh Resident of Village- Sonhar, P.S.- Sheosagar, District- Rohtas at Sasaram.

3.

Munna Singh Son of Bhagwati Singh Resident of Village- Sonhar, P.S.- Sheosagar, District- Rohtas at Sasaram.

4.

Binod Sah Son of Sheo Kumar Sah Resident of Village- Sonhar, P.S.- Sheosagar, District- Rohtas at Sasaram.

5.

Rajesh Sah Son of Bhikhari Sah Resident of Village- Sonhar, P.S.- Sheosagar, District- Rohtas at Sasaram.

6.

Tuntun Singh Son of Satyendra Singh Resident of Village- Sonhar, P.S.- Sheosagar, District- Rohtas at Sasaram.

7.

Ashok Singh Son of Bhikhari Singh Resident of Village- Sonhar, P.S.- Sheosagar, District- Rohtas at Sasaram.

8.

Amit Singh @ Amit Kumar Singh Son of Kedar Singh Resident of VillageSonhar, P.S.- Sheosagar, District- Rohtas at Sasaram. 9.

Deepak Singh Son of Baban Singh Resident of Village- Sonhar, P.S.- Sheosagar, District- Rohtas at Sasaram.

10.

Ajay Singh Son of Ram Niwas Singh Resident of Village- Sonhar, P.S.- Sheosagar, District- Rohtas at Sasaram.

11.

Vijay Singh @ Vijay Kumar Singh Son of Ram Niwas Singh Resident of Village- Sonhar, P.S.- Sheosagar, District- Rohtas at Sasaram. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raghunandan Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 23-11-2021 Let the defects, if any, be removed within four weeks after complete start of the physical Court.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15634 of 2021(2) dt.23-11-2021 2/3 Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Petitioner No.4 Binod Sah and petitioner No.5 Rajesh Sah have already been arrested in this case. Hence, their prayer for anticipatory bail is infructuous now.

Other petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147/148/149/341/323/307/504/506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Submission is that other petitioners bear general and omnibus allegation of commission of assault by pelting stones as well as by lathi on non-vital part.

Learned counsel for the informant opposed the prayer for bail.

Considering general and omnibus nature of allegation, let the petitioners, above named, except petitioner No.4 Binod Sah and petitioner No.5 Rajesh Sah, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court-below where the case is pending in connection with Sheosagar Police Station Case

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15634 of 2021(2) dt.23-11-2021 3/3 No.241 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as well as condition that the petitioners shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioners. The petitioners shall not leave the country without permission of the trial Court.

(Birendra Kumar, J) Mkr./- U T