Amar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.24090 of 2015 Arising out of PS.Case No. -52 Year- 2015 Thana -DHAMDAHA District- PURNIA ====================================================== Amar Singh, Son of Late Kushmal Singh, resident of villageBhawanikhera, P.S. Basngarmar, District - Unnaw ( U.P. ) .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Jha, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Mr. Satyendra Nr. Singh (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 06-07-2015 The petitioner is languishing in custody since 28.02.2015 in connection with Dhamdaha P.S. Case No. 52 of 2015 for the offences instituted under Sections 366A, 307, 373 of the I.P.C. and 8/11 of the Child Marriage Act. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The prosecution story, in brief, is that on 26.02.2015 at 4.00 P.M., the petitioner came to the native village Fulbariya of the informant and took her to Tulsi Kuriya Baran Tola and forcefully wanted to perform her marriage but she started crying then the people of locality came there and informed the police and then the police came. On the aforesaid fardbeyan, F.I.R. was lodged and investigation started.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24090 of 2015 (2) dt.06-07-2015 2/2 It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Further from perusal of the F.I.R., it appears that the petitioner had come for Bidagari of his Bhabhi but he was pressurised by the informant's family for marriage with the informant and when he refused to marry present false case was lodged in collusion with the villagers. It is further submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 28.02.2015. On behalf of the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances that the informant was taken away by the petitioner rather there was only suggestion that the petitioner wanted to take away her, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. Ist Class, Purnea, in connection with Dhamdaha P.S. Case No. 52 of 2015. U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U T