Priyanshu Kumar @ Priyanshu Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4121 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-242 Year-2024 Thana- ISUAPUR District- Saran ====================================================== Priyanshu Kumar @ Priyanshu Kumar Singh S/o Jai Prakash Singh R/o Village - Usari Kala, P.S - Isuapur, District - Saran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 06-02-2026 Heard Mr. Ashok Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Isuapur P.S. Case No. 242 of 2024, F.I.R. dated 25.10.2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 109, 126(2), 303(2), 351(2), 352, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.
3. Allegation against the petitioner is that he along with other co-accused person has assaulted to the brother of the informant due to which he sustained injury.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that the allegation as
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4121 of 2026(2) dt.06-02-2026 2/3 alleged in the F.I.R. is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R. From perusal of the F.I.R, it appears that the F.I.R. is in two parts, in first part, there is general and omnibus allegation against all the accused persons including the petitioner and in second part, there is specific allegation against the petitioner that he along with other coaccused person, namely, Jay Prakash Singh has assaulted to the brother of the informant namely Raja Kumar Singh. Although he has received injury but the injury report suggests that the injury inflicted upon the injured person namely Raja Kumar Singh is simple in nature caused by hard and blund substance.
5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the petitioner having clean antecedent and the injury inflicted upon the injured person is simple in nature, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate/Court concerned at Saran at Chapra in connection with Isuapur P.S. Case No. 242 of 2024, subject to the conditions as
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4121 of 2026(2) dt.06-02-2026 3/3 laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure/ Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023 and with other following conditions :-
(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.
(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witness, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
(3) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Ibrar//- U T