Vishwanath Singh @ Shrinath Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4171 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-206 Year-2024 Thana- Bikramganj Excise District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.

Vishwanath Singh @ Shrinath Yadav S/O Late Babu Lal Singh @ Godhan Singh R/o Vill.- Ghosia Kala, P.S.- Bikramganj, District - Rohtas 2.

Rishi Chaudhary @ Dharmendra S/O late Nathuni Bind @ Nathuni Chaudhary R/o Vill.- Ghosia Kala, P.S.- Bikramganj, District - Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Gauri Shankar Gupta, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 25-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioners have preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Bikramganj P.S. Case No. 206 of 2024 dated 14.12.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/s 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, total 80 litres of illicit country made liquor was recovered from the possession of the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. The recovery has been made from the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4171 of 2025(2) dt.25-02-2025 2/2 road side which is an open place and easily accessible to anyone. The petitioners have no concern with the alleged recovery. The name of the petitioners has transpired in this case merely on the basis of the suspicion. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. The petitioners have clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioners are in custody since 14.12.2024.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioners.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the nature of allegation levelled against the petitioners and the period of custody, the petitioners abovenamed, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bailbond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Rohtas at Sasaram, in connection with Bikramganj P.S. Case No. 206 of 2024.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Jyoti/- U T