Dr. Jaidip Das v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8017 of 2017 ====================================================== Dr. Jaidip Das Son of Dr. Binay Kumar Das resident of Amla Tola, Mangal Bazar, Chanakya Tower, Police Station - Nagar Thana, District - Katihar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Zonal Manager, Central Bank of India, Zonal Office, Maurya Lok Complex, Patna.

3.

The Regional Manager, Central Bank of India, Regional Office, Purnia. 4.

The Branch Manager, Cental Bank of India, Main Branch, Katihar, New Market Road, District - Katihar 5.

Smt. Sutapa Das wife of Sri Dr. Jaidip Das resident of Amla Tola, Mangal Bazar, Chanakya Tower Katihar, Distt. Katihar. 6.

Smt. Keya Biswas wife of Late Santosh Kumar Biswas resident of Green Soap Para, Katihar, Distt. - Katihar.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.

For the Bank :

Mr. Prabhakar Jha, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Anuj Kumar, A.C. to G.P.24 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 22-08-2019 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. Mr. Prabhakar Jha, learned counsel for the Bank as also learned counsel for the State are present.

It appears that the writ application has been preferred against the judgment of the Certificate issued by the Debts Recovery Tribunal in exercise of it's power under Section 19 of the Recovery of Debts due to Banks, Financial Institutions Act, 1993 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act of 1993') learned counsel for the Bank is correct in saying that the impugned

Patna High Court CWJC No.8017 of 2017(2) dt.22-08-2019 2/2 judgment is an appealable judgment in terms of Section 20 of the Act of 1993 and if the petitioner has not availed the statutory remedy of appeal there is no reason why a writ application be entertained at this stage by this court.

In the given facts and circumstances of the case, the writ application is dismissed but with liberty to the petitioner to avail his remedy if any available in accordance with law. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Rajeev/- U