Nagina Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7214 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-60 Year-2021 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Saran ====================================================== NAGINA RAM S/o Bhanu Ram R/o Village- Gopal Bari, West Tola, P.S.- Mashrakh, Distt- Saran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ravi Prakash For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rajendra Prasad Nat ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 18-03-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

The prosecution case, in brief, is that earlier the marriage of the informant was solemnized with the petitioner thereafter, the petitioner along with co-accused used to torture the informant mentally and physically due to non-fulfillment of dowry demand of Rs. Five lakhs and also assaulted her. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. The petitioner is husband of the informant due to which he has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7214 of 2023(2) dt.18-03-2023 2/2 falsely been implicated in the present case. He has never demanded dowry from the informant and still ready to keep his wife/informant with full dignity and honour. A statement has been made in para-3 of the petition that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. It is further submitted that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 14.5.2022. Learned APP appearing for the state and learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 60 of 2021 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Saran at Chapra. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Amandeep/- U T