← Library
Patna High CourtC.Misc./48/2022dismissed

Arun Kumar Singh v. Surendra Prasad Singh

2022-06-23Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.48 of 2022 ====================================================== Arun Kumar Singh son of late Ganesh Prasad Singh resident of MohallaNazirpur Balughat, P.S.- Town, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Surendra Prasad Singh son of Late Ram Sanehi Singh resident of MohallaNazirpur Balughat, P.S.- Town, District- Muzaffarpur. 2.

Shila Devi wife of Gyaneshwar Singh resident of Mohalla- Nazirpur Balughat, P.S.- Town, District- Muzaffarpur.

3.

Kalyan Kumar son of late Gobind Prasad resident of Mohalla- Nazirpur Balughat, P.S.- Town, District- Muzaffarpur.

4.

Most. Mirdula Devi wife of late Arvind Kumar Singh resident of MohallaNazirpur Balughat, P.S.- Town, District- Muzaffarpur. 5.

Amit Kumar Singh son of late Arvind Kumar Singh resident of MohallaNazirpur Balughat, P.S.- Town, District- Muzaffarpur. 6.

Alock Kumar son of late Arvind Kumar Singh resident of Mohalla- Nazirpur Balughat, P.S.- Town, District- Muzaffarpur.

7.

Ashok Kumar Singh son of late Ganesh Prasad Singh resident of MohallaNazirpur Balughat, P.S.- Town, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajeev Ranjan, Advocate Mr. Rajiv Ranjan Dwivedi, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 23-06-2022 Heard Mr. Rajeev Ranjan, learned counsel for the petitioner.

By filing a petition under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC, the petitioner-plaintiff sought amendment in the decree which the learned court below has rejected vide impugned order dated 2.11.2021 holding that the amendment sought is not permissible and the decree cannot be amended under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC

Patna High Court C.Misc. No.48 of 2022(2) dt.23-06-2022 2/2 inasmuch as the aforesaid provision in the statute is for amendment of pleading and the petitioner is not seeking the amendment in the pleading.

In view of the finding arrived at by the learned executing court, the impugned order is not erroneous and there is no material irregularity or jurisdictional error in the impugned order.

Accordingly, this application stands dismissed. (Anil Kumar Sinha, J) S.Ali/- U