← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./2359/2019dismissed

Funa Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-01-18Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.2359 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-627 Year-2018 Thana- BARACHATTI District- Gaya ====================================================== Funa Devi Jawahar Vishwakarma, Resident of Village and P.S.- Barachatti, District- Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar and Ors BIHAR

2. Balo Vishwakarma Late Shivnarayan Vishwakrma. Resident of village and P.S.- Barachatti, Dist.- Gaya.

3. Prakash Vishwakarma Balo Vishwakarma. Resident of village and P.S.- Barachatti, Dist.- Gaya.

4. Pawan Vishwakarma Son of Balo Vishwakarma Resident of village and P.S.- Barachatti, Dist.- Gaya.

5. Kundan Vishwakarma Late Rambali Vishwakarma. Resident of village and P.S.- Barachatti, Dist.- Gaya.

6. Saraswati Devi Late Rambali Vishwakarma. Resident of village and P.S.- Barachatti, Dist.- Gaya.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pancha Nand Pandit ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 18-01-2019 Petitioner has filed the instant application for cancellation of bail of opposite party nos. 2 to 6, which has been granted to opposite party nos. 2 to 6 by learned Additional Sessions Judge -II, Gaya in ABP No. 271/20183629/2018, arising out of Barachattin P.S. Case No. 627/2018 for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 324, 325, 307, 379, 445, 427, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, on the ground that informant and her husband suffered the serious injuries, however, the same has not been considered by

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2359 of 2019(2) dt.18-01-2019 2/2 the learned Additional Sessions Judge.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, from perusal of the impugned order, it appears that the learned Additional Sessions Judge -II, Gaya has granted the privilege of anticipatory bail to opposite party nos. 2 to 6 after considering the materials available on record and, therefore, there is no illegality in the said order.

Accordingly, I find no merit in the instant application, the same is hereby dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunilkumar/- U T