← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./5642/2026bail rejected

Aurangjeb @ Tirangi @ Firangi v. The State Of Bihar

2026-05-07Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5642 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-691 Year-2025 Thana- MADHAURAH District- Saran ====================================================== Aurangjeb @ Tirangi @ Firangi S/O Saheeb Jan Resident of Vill.- Olhanpur, P.S.- Madhaura, Dist.- Saran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ram Hriday Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 07-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in Madhaura P. S. Case No. 691 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 3, 4, 5 of the Explosive Substances Act and Section 288 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3. On secret information, a raid was conducted and raw material, gun powder, blast materials, etc. were recovered from the house of this petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. As a matter of fact, no incriminating material has been recovered from possession of the petitioner and the alleged recovery was made from the house of Irshad but petitioner and his brother have been made accused in this case on the instigation of local

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5642 of 2026(5) dt.07-05-2026 2/2 Chowkidar. Petitioner is involved in the business of firecrackers and on 7.10.2025, he had filed an application before the District Magistrate, Saran, Chapra and deposited the requisite fee by Challan and requested him to issue license for the same.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that petitioner has got one criminal antecedent of similar nature.

6. Considering huge quantity of recovery from the house of this and criminal antecedent, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is refused.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T