Sharwan Yadav @ Ranjeet Yadav @ Bajaria @ Ranjit Yadav @ Bajari @ Shravan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9585 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-55 Year-2018 Thana- DUMARIYA District- Gaya ====================================================== Sharwan Yadav @ Ranjeet Yadav @ Bajaria @ Ranjit Yadav @ Bajari @ Shravan Yadav S/O Jhari Yadav R/O Vill.- Orwan Tand, P.S.- Maigra, Dist.- Gaya.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Binod Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 04-05-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 353, 504 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 25(1-b), 26, 27 and 35 of the Arms Act, Sections 3, 4 and 5 of the Explosive Substance Act as well as Sections 16, 18 and 20 of the UPA Act.
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that petitioner had earlier moved this Court seeking regular bail by filing Cr. Misc. No. 13733 of 2024 and the same came to be rejected by an order dated 10.05.2024 with liberty to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. It is further submitted that charges against the petitioner stand framed by an order dated 30.10.2025 as would manifest from Annexure-3 to the bail application. It is next submitted that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9585 of 2026(2) dt.04-05-2026 2/2 petitioner is in custody since 02.07.2023 and if the privilege of regular bail is granted to the petitioner, the petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the trial to prove his innocence.
4. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.
5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, the petitioner, abovenamed, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty-Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending in connection with S.T. No. 627 of 2024 arising out of Dumaria P.S. Case No. 55 of 2018.
6. However, it is made clear that if the learned Trial Court comes to a conclusion that the petitioner, after his release on bail, is trying to delay the trial of the case in any manner, the learned Trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T