Patna High CourtCR. MISC./4796/2020dismissed

Priyaranjan Sharma @ Priyaranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2020-01-29Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4796 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-87 Year-2019 Thana- BARABAR TOURIST District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Priyaranjan Sharma @ Priyaranjan Kumar Son of Sri Radha Mohan Singh @ Harimohan Singh, resident of Village- Tilkai, P.S.- Barabar Paryatak (Bishunganj O.P.), District- Jehanabad.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Bhanu Pratap Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 29-01-2020 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks bail in Barabar Paryatak (Bishunganj O.P.) P.S. Case No.87 of 2019 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25(1-B)a, 26 of the Arms Act.

As per the prosecution case, during course of search and raid of Barabar Paryatan (Bishunganj O.P.) P.S. Case Nos.85 of 2019 and 86 of 2019, the petitioner was seen fleeing away with country made rifle and after chase the police party arrested him with rifle.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he is in custody since 07.11.2019. Further submission is that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4796 of 2020(2) dt.29-01-2020 2/2 nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner, rather the alleged arms was recovered from the house of co-villager but the A.S.I. being a relative of the informant of Barabar Paryatak P.S. Case No.85/19, the petitioner was implicated out of vengeance.

Heard learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, who has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that he is also accused in one more case.

Considering the facts and circumstances, as stated above, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail at this stage. However, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail either after six months or after framing of charge in this case. With the aforesaid observation, this application for bail is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) nawalkrs/- U T