Siyaram Mehta v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.460 of 2019 ====================================================== Siyaram Mehta Son of Late Dhannu Mehta, Resident of Village- Parsa Garhi, P.S.- Jadia, District- Supaul.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar and Ors.

2.

The Director, Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation, Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, 3.

The District Land Acquisition Officer, Kosi Project, Saharsa. 4.

The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Kosi Project, Saharsa. 5.

The District Land Acquisition Officer, Kosi Project, Supaul. 6.

The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Kosi Project, Supaul. 7.

The District Land Acquisition Officer, Kosi Project, Araria. 8.

The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Kosi Project, Araria. 9.

The District Land Acquisition Officer, Kosi Project, Purnia. 10.

The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Kosi Project, Purnia. 11.

The Collector, Saharsa.

12.

The Collector, Supaul.

13.

The Collector, Araria.

14.

The Collector, Purnia.

15.

The Executive Engineer, Jal Nishtaran and Anushandhan Pramandal, Purnia. null null ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Veena Kumari Jaiswal, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Sudhir Kumar Upadhyay, AC to GP-7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 23-04-2024 Heard the parties.

2. This petition is being filed on behalf of the petitioner for issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondents to pay the compensation amount to the petitioner with up to date interest over the amount due for the lands belonging to the petitioner which has already been

Patna High Court CWJC No.460 of 2019(2) dt.23-04-2024 2/3 acquired by the respondents in the year 1980-81 and compensation has not been paid as yet and since then the petitioner has been dispossessed from the land and land of the petitioner has already been used for construction of Kosi Canal/barrage in the locality and since then in spite of repeated requests made by the of the petitioner no compensation has been paid as yet.

3. Counter affidavit on behalf of the respondent No.4 (Special Land Acquisition Officer, Kosi Project, Saharsa) which was filed on 6th July, 2019 after service of copy upon the learned counsel for the petitioner on 1st July, 2019 is on record and paragraph 12 read as follows:-

12. That it is humbly stated that the deponent that the answering respondent was not taken possession land in question, the land in question is still vacant and cultivated by the petitioner and such the petitioner is legal owner and his continue possession over the land in question.

4. In view of the said specific statement of the State that his land has not been taken for acquisition purpose and the petitioner did not rebut the same for next five years, accepting

Patna High Court CWJC No.460 of 2019(2) dt.23-04-2024 3/3 it, this Court holds that the writ petition has got no merit.

5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed. (Rajiv Roy, J) Guddu/- U