Dharmendra Mahto v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.15522 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -49 Year- 2014 Thana -DEO District- AURANGABAD ====================================================== Ajay Yadav son of Jagdish Yadav Resident of Village - Haidarchak, P.S. Dhibra, District Aurangabad.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== With Criminal Miscellaneous No.16342 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -49 Year- 2014 Thana -DEO District- AURANGABAD ====================================================== Dharmendra Mahto Son of Late Suryadeo Mahto Resident of Vilalge Kariyar Police staion - Dhirbra, District Aurangabad .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
(In Cr.Misc. No.15522 of 2015) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajendra Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt.Pronati Singh (App) (In Cr.Misc. No.16342 of 2015) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 02/ 19-05-2015 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State.
The petitioners are languishing in custody since 08.10.2014 and 27.10.2014 respectively in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 395 and 398 of the Indian Penal Code.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.15522 of 2015 (02) dt.19-05-2015 2/2 The informant was robbed and the miscreants committed dacoity in the house of the uncle of the informant leading to registration of the present case. In course of committing dacoity one Arvind Vishwakarma was apprehended, who disclosed the name of the petitioners and others. Statements have been made in para nos. 10 and 7 and 8 of the petitions that neither the petitioners have been put on TIP nor there is any recovery from the petitioners. The investigation has already concluded.
Considering the fact that the petitioners have not been put on T.I. Parade, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Deo P.S. Case No. 49 of 2014. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) DKS/- U T