← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./23411/2015bail granted

Satish Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2015-05-20Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.23411 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -32 Year- 2014 Thana -RAJAULI District- NAWADA ====================================================== Satish Paswan , son of Mahendra Paswan, resident of village Sathopur P.S. Dipnagar, district Nalanda at Biharsarif .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajendra Singh Shastrijee (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 20-05-2015 Heard Sri Manoj Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor. This is the second attempt for grant of bail on behalf of the petitioner.

Earlier, prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected along with other two bail petitions of co-accused namely Navin Kumar vide Cr. Misc. No. 22569 of 2014 and Mithu Kumar vide Cr. Misc. No. 35093 of 2014. The petition for bail of the petitioner i.e. Cr. Misc. No. 30863 of 2014 as well as co- accused Navin Kumar and Mithu Kumar was rejected by order dated 25.9.2014. Subsequently, co-accused Mithu Kumar again filed a bail petition vide Cr. Misc. No. 6637 of 2015, in which report was called for regarding the stage of the case and after receipt of the report it transpired that though petitioner was in custody since 4.3.2014,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23411 of 2015 (2) dt.20-05-2015 2/2 even charges were not framed and as such, this court directed that accused Mithu Kumar be enlarged on bail. The case of the petitioner almost stands on similar footing. Accordingly there is no reason to deny the prayer for bail to the petitioner. Let the petitioner, namely, Satish Paswan be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada, District - Nawada in connection with Rajauli P.S. Case No. 32 of 2014 on condition that one of the bailors must be blood relation of the petitioner, and secondly, during the trial the petitioner shall remain present before the court below on each and every date. If continuously on two dates the petitioner fails to appear before the court below without prior permission of the trial court, his bail bond shall stand automatically cancelled.

(Rakesh Kumar, J) Praful/- U T