Parwez @ Pappu @ Dr. Pappu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3891 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-12 Year-2019 Thana- JOKIHAT District- Araria ====================================================== PARWEZ @ PAPPU @ DR. PAPPU Son of Master Samil Resident of Village - Sisauna, P.S.- Jokihat, District - Araria ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anil Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Anita Kumari Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 16-09-2020 The present petition has been taken up for consideration through the mode of Video conferencing in view of the prevailing situation on account of COVID 19 Pandemic, requiring social distancing.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Anita Kumari Singh, learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Jokihat P.S. Case No. 12 of 2019 for the offence registered under Sections 302 and 316/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation as against the petitioner is that he in connivance with the co-accused person, namely, Anwari Khatoon had allured the wife of the informant, who is stated to be pregnant for the purposes of treating her in the private clinic, however, the petitioner who is stated to be a MBBS doctor had

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3891 of 2020(5) dt.16-09-2020 2/2 committed negligence in treating the wife of the informant, resulting in death of the wife of the informant. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent, he has been falsely implicated in the present case and is having a clean antecedent. It is further submitted that the petitioner is not having any complicity in the matter and a false story has been cooked up by the informant with oblique motive.

Per contra, the learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and taking into account the gravity of the offence alleged to have been committed by the petitioner herein, I do not find the present case to be a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail, thus the present petition stands dismissed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U T