← Library
Patna High CourtCR. WJC/418/2019disposed

Arjun Roy v. The State Of Bihar Through The Dire.General Of Police,Main Secretariat,Govt.Of Bihar,Patna And ORS.

2019-02-25Mr. Justice Ashwani Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.418 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year- Thana- District- ====================================================== Arjun Roy Son of Late Prem Lal Rai, Resident of Mohalla- Krishinagar H.NB-10, P.S.-Shastrinagar, District-Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Director General of Police, Main Secretariat, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

2. The IG of Police, Patna Zone, Police Officer near Gandhi Maidan, Patna.

3. The DIG Patna Range

4. The S.S.P. of Police, Patna

5. SHO Shastrinagar Police Station, District-Patna

6. The General Manager, Reserve Bank of India, Patna

7. The M.D. Alchemist Township India Limited Corporation Office, Plot No. F5, Rajiv Gandhi Chandigarh Technology Park (RGCTP) Chandigarh-160101 P.S. I.T. Park, Chandigarh-160101

8. S.N. Sharma, the then Branch Manager Branch Office S.P. Verma Road, P.S.- Kotwali,Patna-800001

9. Krishna Kabir Director of the Company, Corporation Office, Plot No. F-5, Rajiv Gandhi Chandigarh Technology Park (RGCTP) Chandigarh-160101 P.S. I.T. Park, Chandigarh-160101

10. C.S. Dolly Director of the Company, Corporation Office, Plot No.F-5, Rajiv Gandhi Chandigarh Technology Park (RGCTP) Chandigarh-160101 P.S. I.T. Park,Chandigarh-160101 ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Yadav, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.M. Nasrul Huda Khan, SC-1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 25-02-2019 The defects, as pointed out by the registry, are

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.418 of 2019(2) dt.25-02-2019 2/2 ignored.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file a complaint under Sections 190 and 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for the relief prayed for in the present writ petition.

Leave is granted.

The writ petition is disposed of.

(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J) Md. S/SKSuman.

U T