Rupan Mandal v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9368 of 2017 ====================================================== Rupan Mandal S/o Late Meghu Mandal @ Late Meghu Gangota, resident of Village- Bhuriya Dhangatta Mahadeopur, P.S. Sarsi, District- Purnea. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The Commissioner, Purnea Division, Purnea.

3.

The Collector, Purnea.

4.

The Deputy Collector Land Reform, Banmankhi, Purnea. 5.

The Circle Officer, Banmankhi Anchal, Purnea. 6.

Ratan Mala Devi, w/o Amrendra Mishra, Resident of Village- Burhiya Dhangatta Mahadeopur, P.S.- Sarai, District- Purnea. 7.

Kamleshwari Mandal, S/o Late Meghu Mandal @ Late Meghu Gangota. 8.

Ganga Mandal, S/o Late Meghu Mandal @ late Meghu Gangota. 9.

Tubia Devi, W/o Late Anandi Mandal.

10.

Bhola Mandal, S/o Late Anandi Mandal, All Resident of Village- Bhuriya Dhangotta Mahadeopur, P.S. Sarai, District- Purnea. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Surendra Kumar, Adv.

Mr.Ajit Ranjan Kumar, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Raj Kishore Roy-Gp18 For Respondent No.6 :

Mr. Bipin Kumar, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 21-04-2025 Heard Mr. Surendra Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

2. The present petition has been filed for:- "setting aside the judgment and order dated 31.01.2017 passed by member Administrative, the Bihar Land Tribunal, Patna in BLT Case No. 105 of 2015 by which the aforesaid application has been dismissed and the order of the commissioner Purnea Division, Purnea has been confirmed."

Patna High Court CWJC No.9368 of 2017(2) dt.21-04-2025 2/2

3. The concurrent findings are there, the Bihar Land Tribunal, Patna has given the reasons for dismissing the petition of the petitioner, the contradictory statements of the petitioner is also on record.

4. In that background, this Court does not find any reason to interfere with the order.

5. At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he shall be approaching appropriate competent Court for the redressal of the grievance.

6. Without commenting on the merit of the case and granting the said liberty, the writ petition is disposed of. (Rajiv Roy, J) perwez U