Patna High CourtCR. MISC./7053/2026bail rejected

Sahil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-19Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7053 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-272 Year-2025 Thana- PARSABAZAR District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

Sahil Kumar Son of Awdhesh Paswan @ Awadhesh Paswan R/o New Sipara Matkhan, P.S.- Beur, District - Patna 2.

Mukesh Kumar Son of Awdhesh Paswan @ Awadhesh Paswan R/o New Sipara Matkhan, P.S.- Beur, District - Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. Patanjali Rishi, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Mohammad Sufyan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 19-02-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S..

3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that these petitioners, along with other F.I.R. named accused persons, misappropriated the money which was deposited by informant and others in the company and thereafter, when the informant went to withdraw the matured amount, they misbehaved with them, assaulted informant and others and refused to return the matured amount.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7053 of 2026(2) dt.19-02-2026 2/2

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. Petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case with ulterior motive. Petitioners claim clean antecedents.

5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners and submitted that petitioners are named in the F.I.R. and there is specific accusation that they, along with other accused persons, misappropriated the money which was deposited by informant and others and also abused and assaulted them.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, specific and direct nature of accusation and gravity of offence, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T