Patna High CourtCR. MISC./6852/2024bail rejected

Ajay Sah v. The State Of Bihar

2024-04-09Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6852 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-393 Year-2023 Thana- RAJAON District- Banka ====================================================== AJAY SAH SON OF LATE JANKI SAH R/O-KOTWALI, P.S.-RAJOUN (NAWADA), DISTT.-BANKA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Praveen Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anita Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 09-04-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Rajoun (Nawada) P.S. Case No. 393 of 2023 registered on 03.08.2023 under Sections 25(1-B)a of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, F.I.R. has been lodged against the petitioner against whom there is an allegation that there are recovery of four country-made pistols and fourteen live cartridges.

4. Counsel further submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He further submits that petitioner is in custody since 04.08.2023 having two criminal case pending against him, in which he is on bail. Counsel further submits that petitioner's name has been inserted in this case only and only

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6852 of 2024(3) dt.09-04-2024 2/2 due to the reason that his antecedent is not clean. Charge-sheet has already been filed in this case.

5. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that there is recovery of arms along with huge quantity of cartridges.

6. In the present facts and circumstances of this case and the submissions made above this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner that he may renew his prayer for bail two months after framing of charge.

8. Accordingly, the bail application of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

(Dr. Anshuman, J) Sunnykr/- U