Anil Prasad Yadav @ Anil Kumar Yadav @ Anil Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14944 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-97 Year-2017 Thana- TELHARA District- Nalanda ====================================================== ANIL PRASAD YADAV @ ANIL KUMAR YADAV @ ANIL PRASAD S/O Kamta Yadav R/O Village - Mandirsapar, P.S. - Telhara, District- Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Bisheshwar Ram, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 15-09-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State through virtual mode.

Counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out, by the office, within a period of four weeks from the date of restoration of normalcy. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Telhara P.S. case No.97/2017 (S.T. No.633/17) registered under Sections 341, 323, 307, 506/34 of I.P.C., pending in the court of A.D.J. IV, Hilsa, Nalanda. Later on, Section 302 of I.P.C. has been added.

The earlier bail application of the petitioner was rejected vide Annexure P/1 to the present application taking into account that the petitioner is the assailant and there was direct allegation of giving a lathi blow upon the head of the deceased.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14944 of 2021(3) dt.15-09-2021 2/2 The postmortem report also corroborated the allegations made in the F.I.R.

A report was called for from the trial court. It has been reported that all the prosecution witnesses have already been examined and the case has been fixed for argument. Considering the nature of accusation and the stage of the case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The same is rejected.

The Trial Court is directed to take all necessary steps to conclude the trial preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. (Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T