Pramod Kumar Chauhan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.4393 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-121 Year-2018 Thana- BISHWAMBHARPUR District- ====================================================== PRAMOD KUMAR CHAUHAN S/O- Ram Nath Mahto Resident of villageRampur Mukund, P.S.-Bishambharpur, District-Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajesh Roy For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Manish Kumar No2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 31-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in Bishambharpur P.S. Case No. 121 of 2018 (G.R. No.4701 of 2018) registered for the offence punishable under Sections 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is of recovery of one stolen motorcycle from his possession.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. It has further been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the motorcycle was purchased by him after paying consideration money and was not aware that the motorcycle is stolen one. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 22.10.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4393 of 2019(2) dt.31-01-2019 2/2 the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-X, Gopalganj, in connection with Bishambharpur P.S. Case No. 121 of 2018 (G.R. No.4701 of 2018), with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (S. Kumar, J) ranjan/manojU T