Rohin Dhami And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.4346 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-191 Year-2018 Thana- JALALGARH District- Purnia ======================================================

1. Rohin Dhami son of Karia Dhami, Resident of Village- Begampur, P.s.- Jalalgarh, District- Purnea.

2. Sunil Dhami @ Sinil Kumar Dhami son of Rohin Dhami Resident of VillageBegampur, P.S.- Jalalgarh, District- Purnea. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Nadimul Hasan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Bharat Lal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 28-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

Petitioners are in custody in connection with Jalalgarh P.S. Case No. 191 of 2018 for the offence under sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 341, 325, 326, 379, 307, 427, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have no criminal antecedent and in land dispute there is case and counter case in which both sides has sustained injury.

Learned counsel submits that injury report indicates that the injury is simple in nature.

The petitioners are in custody since 15.11.2018.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4346 of 2019(2) dt.28-01-2019 2/2 Considering the totality of the facts and circumstances discussed hereinabove, let the petitioners, named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Purnea, in connection with Jalalgarh P.S. Case No. 191 of 2018 subject to the condition that one of the bailors should be either Mukhia or Sarpanch of the village concerned.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Ravi/- U T