Md. Akbar Hussain Azad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 2466 of 2017 =========================================================== Md. Akbar Hussain Azad, Son of A. Latif, resident of Village- Churakutti, P.O.- Gangihat, P.S.- Kochadhawan, District- Kishanganj. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director Primary Education Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

4. The District Magistrate Kishanganj.

5. The District Education Officer, Kishanganj.

6. The District Programme Officer, (Establishment), Kishanganj.

7. The Block Development Officer, Kochadhawan, District- Kishanganj.

8. The Block Education Officer, Kochadhawan, District- Kishanganj.

9. The Mukhiya, Teghariya Gram Panchayat, Kochadhawan, District- Kishanganj.

10. The Panchayat Secretary, Teghariya Gram Panchayat, Kochadhawan, Kishanganj.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Zaki Haider, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Nishant Kumar Jha, A.C. to S.C. 28 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 23-06-2017 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the appeal filed by him before the District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority, Kishanganj (hereinafter referred to as the 'Authority') be directed to be disposed off expeditiously.

3. Learned counsel for the State does not object.

4. In view of thereof, the writ petition stands disposed off with a direction to the Authority to dispose off the appeal filed by the petitioner expeditiously and in any case within four months from

Patna High Court CWJC No.2466 of 2017 dt.23-06-2017 2/2 the date of production of a copy of this order.

5. It goes without saying that the petitioner shall be at liberty to raise all points before the Authority, including the up-to date developments which shall be considered on their own merit. It is clarified that the Court has not expressed any opinion on merit. (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) P. Kumar AFR/NAFR U