Himanshu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20158 of 2016 (3) dt.22-06-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.20158 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -225 Year- 2013 Thana -MUZAFFARPUR SADAR DistrictMUZAFFARPUR ======================================================

1. Himanshu Kumar, Son of Sudhir Singh @ Sudhir Thakur, Resident of Village-Nawanagar Nizamat, P.S.- Sahebganj, district- Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Upendra Kumar Chaubey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Kr.Singh 1(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 22-06-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in Muzaffarpur Sadar P.S. Case No.225 of 2013, S.T. No.805 of 2013 instituted for the offences under Sections 302 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

This Court has called for a report from the trial court and the same has been received.

From perusal of the report it appears that case is fixed for argument.

The trial court is directed to conclude the trial within a period of two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order and if the case is

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20158 of 2016 (3) dt.22-06-2016 disposed of within the aforesaid period the trial court will submit a report.

In this view of the matter, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly the prayer for bail is rejected.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Vinay/- U T